x�+� � | 217 0 obj <>stream x�+� � | x�+� � | endstream 51 0 obj <>stream endstream x����@D��Sj�ܻ�K*I���!#����d�I�L=h���">���'�7p�!���ׯz�:i� +�}R%�:��gl�72�p��5�����,�T���c� Y~���FE��~8"� endobj 161 0 obj <>stream case. x����@D��Sjܻ,�b�bA%�6����wer�IN&���w��X�� ��l,�%�Q��(��a�5����M�94/�c�߈UnmT��9.�g���V�8�w߅�Dq��U����XzHZ\筻Q騦F�"� endstream endstream 20 0 obj <>stream 67 0 obj <>stream x�+� � | endstream endstream KITZMILLER V. DOVER* by David K. DeWolf,** John G. West,*** and Casey Luskin**** I. endobj endobj Dover Decision ( KB pdf); Kitzmiller Plaintiff’s Brief ( “Intelligent Design” is a religious view, not a scientific theory, according to U.S. District Judge John E. Jones III in his historic decision in Kitzmiller v. 122 0 obj <>stream x�+� � | x�+� � | endobj endstream 216 0 obj <>stream endobj endstream x����@D��Sj�ܻX,U,�$��†�B0����L&���dPӃv��#�bڌs�gO�yPD�w$���[�Y?�j߼̖M�~V�sIUV��0��1Loh�p���R��lxj� ͘;�..��ߨ�T��"� endstream x�+� � | endobj x�+� � | 171 0 obj <>stream x�M=�@�߯���q����$78�8F ~�~�&MڦEEO:8b�N�� jR�,^=��A��:� 39 0 obj <>stream 43 0 obj <>stream endobj x��?�0���)nԡ�^)�8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������3��:'��`s?�j߼̖�j��u� 128 0 obj <>stream endstream 68 0 obj <>stream endobj endobj x����@D��Sjܻ������$[X�\F >�ߕ�$'9�jz���S1".2/�:q�������7� �e��߄U�\R��9��g�ڨE�{�ƷLq,�<5}�h��El.��ߨ�T�C�"� x����@D��Sjܻ��b�bA%�6����we2�$'����w��X�� �f�[J.#C\O����б�ȳn�͡yy����F�2k�����qi?����F��4�}l��PNWxn�K��u޺��j���"' 196 0 obj <>stream endstream endobj endstream x�+� � | He also ruled that members of Dover's school board lied under oath to hide their religious motivations. 88 0 obj <>stream 25 0 obj <>stream endstream 98 0 obj <>stream endobj x�+� � | endobj x�+� � | 63 0 obj <>stream 132 0 obj <>stream x�+� � | en español In the legal case Kitzmiller v. Dover, tried in in a Harrisburg, PA, Federal District Court, “intelligent design” was found Decision in Kitzmiller v. endobj Date: 20 décembre 2005: Source: ACLU link, and Archived link at the Internet Archive. 4 0 obj <>stream endstream endstream x�+� � | endstream endobj endobj x�+� � | endstream 265 0 obj <>stream endobj x�+� � | x�+� � | endstream endobj endstream 117 0 obj <>stream endstream x����@D��Sjܻ,�����$[X�\F >�ߕ�I&9�jz���S�".va�:q���Xc�GZ�W�޲N�o��8�Te�s���F��"��=\�[�8��"OM b1w�|s���F���~E�"� 199 0 obj <>stream 224 0 obj <>stream endobj 113 0 obj <>stream x��?�0���)n�y���8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������h�X��=���)���H'�7�m?�j߼��u�~Vֹ�*+�u����72�p���R��lxj� �a� Yq���F���~�"� endstream endobj endobj �'A�@`M�&7pm��C�XG�7b�[Ue��K����F��*N��w�-Q�l��f�f,=$-���ݨtT�,"� endstream endstream endstream It was featured on the cover of Time magazine,1 its study was seemingly endorsed by the President of the United States,2 and it became one of the most talked-about issues in the public square. 94 0 obj <>stream 89 0 obj <>stream endstream 141 0 obj <>stream x�+� � | endobj x��=�0���WܨC�o)�pTq`�����B0���[�\r�s�CM�����.ea�ux���o� 138 0 obj <>stream 130 0 obj <>stream 134 0 obj <>stream 100 0 obj <>stream endobj 177 0 obj <>stream x��?�0���)n�y��:�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������h3/�Xߑ N p��a x�+� � | endobj 160 0 obj <>stream endobj endobj endobj endobj x�+� � | v Dover Area School District et al. endobj endstream endstream 258 0 obj <>stream Dover Area School District policy requiring the teaching of intelligent design. endobj x��?�0���)n�y���8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������h�X��=��A PDF, EPUB, MOBI, DOC, etc). endstream 0[6��*ֹ��*+�u����7R�p����ќ-���Nc� ��Lk��SM?�"� endobj endstream endstream 243 0 obj <>stream accompanied by them is this traipsing into evolution intelligent design and the kitzmiller v dover decision that can be your partner. endobj endstream x����@D��Sjܻ��b�bA%�6����we2�$'����w��X�� �f�[J.��(���A�ck�g9�D�C��0;6Q��Xe�FUY���~&?���Z�i��.�š����A�����:oݍJG5� Ȝ"- Bookmark File PDF Traipsing Into Evolution Intelligent Design And The Kitzmiller V Dover Decision Traipsing Into Evolution Intelligent Design And The Kitzmiller V Dover Decision Yeah, reviewing a book traipsing into evolution intelligent design and the kitzmiller v dover decision could ensue your close contacts listings. endobj endobj endobj 148 0 obj <>stream Dover Area School District policy requiring the teaching of intelligent design. endobj endobj endobj 73 0 obj <>stream endstream x����@D��Sj�pﲰ����$[X�\F >�ߕ�I&9�jz���1".v^�ux������;� �&Z`?�j߼̖�j��uᜪ� endobj 144 0 obj <>stream endobj endstream endstream 12 0 obj <>stream endstream endstream endstream Dover Decision ( KB pdf); Kitzmiller Plaintiff’s Brief ( “Intelligent Design” is a religious view, not a scientific theory, according to U.S. District Judge John E. Jones III in his historic decision in Kitzmiller v. Dover. endobj x�+� � | Pa. 2005) was the first direct challenge brought in the United States federal courts testing a public school district policy that required the teaching of intelligent design. x�+� � | x�+� � | endobj Ce fichier et sa description proviennent de Wikimedia Commons. endobj x�+� � | endstream endstream 61 0 obj <>stream INTRODUCTION The year 2005 was the year the theory of intelligent design (ID) made the headlines. x��?�0���)nԡ�^)�8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������3��;�#A�@P�>C�i�o^f�F�_��:����_����az#5z����-���OM`���i�oTz�� R"� 116 0 obj <>stream endstream endobj ��3�����{�ƷDs4g<5}��$-.��ߨ�T��"� 146 0 obj <>stream endobj 142 0 obj <>stream ?�j߼��u�~V��IUV��0��1LodZ-�8��5����9_��,c� ��Lk��SM? 166 0 obj <>stream endobj endobj endstream endobj endobj 105 0 obj <>stream 286 0 obj<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]/Font<>>> x��?�0���)n�y���8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������h37l�=������H'��a��i�o^z�:i� +�\R��:��g��V8�p�o��h�xj� k1w���Lk��SM? endstream x����@D��Sjܻ,�b�bA%�6����wer�IN&���w��X�� ��l,�%�Q��(��a�5����M�94/�c�߈UnmT��9.�g���V�8�w߅�Dq��U���C�������[w��QM?F#"� x�+� � | 276 0 obj <>stream 183 0 obj <>stream endobj endobj 55 0 obj <>stream endobj 278 0 obj <>stream 253 0 obj <>stream 80 0 obj <>stream endstream 221 0 obj <>stream endstream endobj 159 0 obj <>stream x�+� � | ��3�������_�[���OM��$�eZ���j��"� 227 0 obj <>stream x��?�0���)n�y���8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������h�X��=��A2���H'�7�m?�j߼��u�~Vֹ�*+�u����72�p���R��lxj� ј;HV\���Q驦e"� https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fichier:Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District.pdf. endstream 234 0 obj <>stream x��?�0���)n�y�-�8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������3��:ߑ N (b���~�վy�-���&�r璪���an?c���F-�8��5����9[�����Atq���F���~�"� 0[6��*��9U��:��g���8�p�o��h�xj��x6w���Lk��SM?�"� x�+� � | endstream endstream endstream x����@��}�)�@v�K*I���!x�@�}~O&�L��dPӃv��#bC��Ϟ�� 0[6��*֙s�*+�u����7R�p�����lxj��x8w���Lk��SM?$"� x�+� � | endstream endstream endobj endstream x�+� � | endobj x��?�0���)n�y���8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������h�X��=���eߑ N (bo��~�վy�-��&��sIUV��0��1LodZ-�8��5�����,���Nc� Yq���F���~@"� endstream endstream en español In the legal case Kitzmiller v. Dover, tried in in a Harrisburg, PA, Federal District Court, “intelligent design” was found Decision in Kitzmiller v. 0[6��*֙s�*+�u����7R�p�����lxj� �b� iq���F���~"� x�+� � | x�+� � | x�+� � | endobj v. Dover Area School Board (2005), a controversial district court decision … x����@D��Sjܻ,�����$[X�\F >�ߕ�I&9�jz���S�".va�:Q� �gS%����7� �e��߄�q.�� x�+� � | v. Dover Area School District, et al. endstream x�+� � | endstream endobj x����@D��Sjܻ,�����$[X�\F >�ߕ�I&9�jz���S�".va�:��;� ΦJ`��i�o^z�:i� +�\R��9��g��V�8�p�o���<5}��`� ��2���JO5� E�"� endstream endobj 65 0 obj <>stream x��?�0���)n�y�-�:�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������3˹�x���m! 2005) win’s view. x�L=�@�߯���qpw�*L����B� ����=i��i����<1x#Z�F�6Ϟ���(��q��}S��V���������*�M�������az#�j ��=\�[�8��%<5}�q�;H�.��ߨ�T� endstream 225 0 obj <>stream endstream endobj x�+� � | x�+� � | 181 0 obj <>stream �;��g����{��o���<5}��1w�ls���F���~C�"� 78 0 obj <>stream endstream x����@D��Sjܻ������$[X�\F >�ߕ�$'9�jz���S1".2/�: �gS%���i�o^f�&i� �¹�*+�s����7�Q�8�p�o��X�yj� �s��Lk��SM?E/"� x��?�0���)nԡ�^i�8�80I����`!����[�\r��.��������f�;���H'��ȳ~�վy�-�~��9U��:��g���8�p�o��h�<5}�՘;HZ\���Q驦�"� endobj x�+� � | endobj endobj endstream Ce fichier a été identifié comme étant exempt de restrictions connues liées au droit d’auteur, y compris tous les droits connexes et voisins. endstream 279 0 obj <>stream x�+� � | The reference book, Of Pan-das and People, is available for students who might be interested in gaining an understanding of what Intelligent De-sign actually involves. ?�j߼��u�~V��IUV��0��1LodZ-�8��5����9_�����A2w���F���~ x��?�0���)nԡ�^)�8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������3��:���H'��`s?�j߼̖�j��u� x��?�0���)nԡ�^i�8�80I����`!����[�\r��.��������f�;���H'��ȳ~�վy�-�~��9U��:��g���8�p�o��h�<5}�Ә;HZ\���Q驦*"� Fichier d’origine ‎(1 275 × 1 650 pixels ; taille du fichier : 310 Kio ; type MIME : application/pdf ; 139 pages), https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/PDMCreative Commons Public Domain Mark 1.0falsefalse. x�+� � | 222 0 obj <>stream endstream endobj endstream 157 0 obj <>stream 44 0 obj <>stream endstream 74 0 obj <>stream endstream endstream endstream Le principal enjeu des plaignants pour ce procès était de démontrer que le dessein intelligent était assimilé à la religion , étant donné que ce courant de pensée ne mentionne pas clairement un « créateur » (i.e. endobj endobj endobj endobj Below are links to complete transcripts of testimony at the Kitzmiller v. Dover trial. 198 0 obj <>stream x��?�0���)n�y���8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������h�X��=�础(��qAk����#���+@oY'�7ae�K���_����az#�j����-U�f�����A��2���JO5� ��"W endobj 123 0 obj <>stream �"� endstream endobj The Truth About the Dover Intelligent Design Trial Discovery Institute November 15, 2007 Intelligent Design Responses to Dover Ruling. 186 0 obj <>stream endobj endstream endstream x�+� � | Q��aA�y�Í��7/�e�߈5�6�� KITZMILLER V. DOVER* by David K. DeWolf,** John G. West,*** and Casey Luskin**** I. 35 0 obj <>stream 29 0 obj <>stream endstream endstream endobj 14 0 obj <>stream x�+� � | endobj endobj endstream x����@D��Sj�rw��*T�laaCp!���~W&�Lrf2��A�@�H-�Oi,;�gO�y0R!t$�&�(Ro�Ci�o^z�Z�_��z/���_����qz#�j����-S��f����0s��inT��:"� It was featured on the cover of Time magazine,1 its study was seemingly endorsed by the President of the United States,2 and it became one of the most talked-about 87 0 obj <>stream endobj endobj x��?�0���)nԡ�^)�8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������3��;�#A�@P�>Cns��V��`�lT�U��s�*+�u����7R�p����ќ-����`� iq���F���~&"� 97 0 obj <>stream x�+� � | 64 0 obj <>stream 273 0 obj <>stream 85 0 obj <>stream endobj 2005) win’s view. endstream endstream x�+� � | endobj x��?�0���)n�y���8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������h��l�=���X���H'�7���i�o^z�:i� �ܹ�*+�u����72�p���R��lxj� �0w���Lk��SM?�"� j"� x��=�@D��Sj�,�*T�\aaC� ����=��d��ɠ�;m18+�����c��4*���$�4VE�p�v���n�F�'b��FuU��ҽ'?��Z����/�-1��/���Qb�!iy���J�����N"7 endobj endobj 126 0 obj <>stream endstream x����@D��Sjܻ������$[X�\F >�ߕ�I&9�jz���S1".v^�ux���Q��;� ΦJ`?�j߼̖M�~V�sIUV��0��1Loh�q���2��yj����A��2���JO5� D�"� 38 0 obj <>stream x�+� � | endobj x�+� � | endobj endstream 189 0 obj <>stream endstream x�+� � | endstream 163 0 obj <>stream endobj x����@��}�)�@v�K*I���!x�@�}~O&�L��dPӃv��#bC��Ϟ��Q��aA�y�Í��7/�e�߈5�6�� 120 0 obj <>stream Judge John E. Jones III, who was nominated by President George W. Bush, made a very strong ruling against intelligent design.He ruled that it is creationism and is not science. endobj 153 0 obj <>stream endobj 179 0 obj <>stream endobj endobj x����@D��Sjܻ������$[X�\F >�ߕ�$'9�jz���S1".2/�:Q� �gS%���i�o^f�&i� �¹�*+�s����7�Q�8�p�o��X�yj� �s��Lk��SM?G_"� endobj 245 0 obj <>stream x�+� � | 184 0 obj <>stream endstream 155 0 obj <>stream 237 0 obj <>stream endobj Dover Decision ( KB pdf); Kitzmiller Plaintiff’s Brief ( “Intelligent Design” is a religious view, not a scientific theory, according to U.S. District Judge John E. Jones III in his historic decision in Kitzmiller v. Dover. 70 0 obj <>stream Dover Decision ( KB pdf); Kitzmiller Plaintiff’s Brief ( “Intelligent Design” is a religious view, not a scientific theory, according to U.S. District Judge John E. Jones III in his historic decision in Kitzmiller v. Dover. endobj H��Vђ�6}�+�h:�����6i:��΄NH�} �z%��m?��J���tvXHW��{ιz��S*V��v�{3�g"�f"��F�HL��T̟z�X�5/�߾e���^:�ofa�J�c1M&�l�w�I��eȏ��o�i��u}�'IHa�ԥlJ��J��:a*�_�b-hg�SF��q:����.�O��3_Y������,�Ƴӆ�yC�7��Bn-�;���ۊ��Ls>�����(�vJo�2�%�O8�r�Vh�#U�.���ʗ0���$��s��a����X0�. 194 0 obj <>stream endstream endobj endstream 1 0 obj<> endstream 75 0 obj <>stream x��?�0���)nԡ�^)�:�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������3˹�x����B4|G�8���>C��#���+�l٨��X�֪����an?c��H�^�q��k|K4Gs��S�8�����2���JO5� �"� endstream 21 0 obj <>stream endstream endstream endobj 04cv2688: Plaintiffs : Judge Jones: v. :: DOVER AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al.,:: Defendants. x�+� � | 173 0 obj <>stream endobj endobj }8�80I����`!����[�\r��.��������ZK�,g'x���q��#�8�F�.w�#���+�n٪����"�*+�u����7Rkp����ќ-���"�;贸Lk��SM? Taille de cet aperçu JPG pour ce fichier PDF : 463 × 599 pixels. x����@��}�)�@v�K*I���!x�@�}~O&�L��dPӃv��+�!ӌsų��\G�0��}�����-6��OM����i�nT:�� x��=�0���WܨC��mqTq`�����B0���[�\r�s�CM�b�F)}�ܲ�x���m!BGi�"�9�u#���+�lو�+XY�EUV��0��1Noh�p���2�ɜ/����a� uq���Fe��~ "� endobj x����@D��Sjܻ������$[X�\F >�ߕ�I&9�jz���S1".v^�ux���aQ� �gS%���i�o^f�&i� �¹�*+�s����7�Q�8�p�o���<5}����A��2���JO5� B�"� x����@D��Sjܻ������$[X�\F >�ߕ�I&9�jz���S1".v^�ux������H78�*�-,�H�}� endobj endstream endstream endobj endstream endobj 83 0 obj <>stream x�+� � | endobj x��?�0���)nԡ�^)�8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������3��; ߑ N (b�!�9�H�}� endobj 152 0 obj <>stream endstream endobj 103 0 obj <>stream 13 0 obj <>stream en español In the legal case Kitzmiller v. Dover, tried in in a Harrisburg, PA, Federal District Court, “intelligent design” was found Decision in Kitzmiller v. x�+� � | x����@D��Sjܻ,�b�bA%�6����wer�IN&���w��X�� ��-�%�1�(��aA���"79�D�C���;�Q��Xk�����qi?���H�Z�i��.�%�����KI��u7*��ɰ"1 This paper explores the soundness of Judge Jones’ decision and investigates parallels between the McLean and 79 0 obj <>stream endstream endstream endobj endobj endobj endstream x�+� � | x�+� � | endobj endstream 49 0 obj <>stream 232 0 obj <>stream 62 0 obj <>stream endobj endobj endobj INTRODUCTION The year 2005 was the year the theory of intelligent design (ID) made the headlines. endobj 149 0 obj <>stream x�+� � | its post-trial opinion, however, the court first analyzed Dover’s policy under the endorsement test,15 and only after that did it apply the Lemon test to the policy.16 A. endobj endobj 0[6��*ֹs�*+�u����7R�p����ќ-����`� iq���F���~�"� x�+� � | endobj x��?�0���)n�y���8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������h�X��=��A���H'�7�m?�j߼��u�~Vֹ�*+�u����72�p���R��lxj�x`1w���Lk��SM? endstream 267 0 obj <>stream endstream x�+� � | endstream endstream endstream x�+� � | endstream endobj x�+� � | endobj 28 0 obj <>stream x��?�0���)nԡ�^[�8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������X3�8wx���� ߑ N (b�"�r��V��`�lU�U�3�TUV��0��1Lo�p����ќ.���F0wS\���Q驦�"� x��?�0���)n�y���8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������h�X��=��Agߑ N (bo��~�վy�-��&��sIUV��0��1LodZ-�8��5�����,����@c� Yq���F���~"� v Dover Area School District et al. 213 0 obj <>stream 101 0 obj <>stream endstream endobj 115 0 obj <>stream endobj endobj endobj x�+� � | endobj x�+� � | endstream x�+� � | endobj PDF of decision hosted on Wikimedia Commons at File:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District.pdf . endstream endstream x�+� � | ACLU of Pennsylvania attorney Vic Walczak discusses the Kitzmiller v. Dover Area Schools case with the plaintiffs at the 2006 Membership Conference The decision is a victory not only for the ACLU, who led the legal challenge, but for all who believe it is in appropriate, and unconstitutional, to advance a particular religious belief at the expense of our children's education. x�+� � | 34 0 obj <>stream x��?�0���)nԡ�^)�:�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������3˹�x���g!�#A�@�b�����V��`�lT�U�skUUV��0��1Lo�F/�8��5�%��9[�����ARw���F���~�"� 195 0 obj <>stream endstream endstream 156 0 obj <>stream 211 0 obj <>stream ��;� ΦJ`?�j߼̖M�~V�sIUV��0��1Loh�q���2��yj����A��2���JO5� D"� endobj x��?�0���)n�y���:�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������h37\Xߑ N p��Q�~�վy�-��&���IUV��0��1LodZ-�8��5����9_�����A2w���F���~ �"� endobj 235 0 obj <>stream n"� endstream endstream x����@D��Sjܻ������$[X�\F >�ߕ�$'9�jz���S1".2/�:Q� �gS%���i�o^f�&i� �¹�*+�s����7�Q�8�p�o��X�yj� �9�.bs���F���~E�"� 1"� �"� endobj Dover Decision ( KB pdf); Kitzmiller Plaintiff’s Brief ( “Intelligent Design” is a religious view, not a scientific theory, according to U.S. District Judge John E. Jones III in his historic decision in Kitzmiller v. Dover. endstream 109 0 obj <>stream endobj endstream endobj endobj x��?�0���)nԡ�^i�8�80I����`!����[�\r��.��������f�;���H'��ȳ~�վy�-�~��9U��:��g���8�p�o��h�<5}�X�$-.��ߨ�T��"� Traipsing into Evolution: Intelligent Design and the Kitzmiller V. Dover Decision: DeWolf, David K., West, John G., Luskin, Casey: Amazon.sg: Books 108 0 obj <>stream x��?�0���)nԡ�^)�:�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������3˹�x���' ߑ N p��P��H�}� endstream endstream endstream 60 0 obj <>stream endobj 135 0 obj <>stream x�L=�@�߯���q����$� .�����'M�&mS����'oĊ8�4����S|�@�;��B�y�Ï��7� �e�߈M�\T��8��g��5Kp��o�a%�Kxj� I0w��eZ���j��"� 204 0 obj <>stream x�̽�@�~�bJ-v��;-U,�$��†�A0���=�L2ɗɢ��<18#�b�[�gO�y- ߑ n p6�f?�j߼̖�j��uᜪ� endstream x�+� � | endobj endobj endobj Dover Decision ( KB pdf); Kitzmiller Plaintiff’s Brief ( “Intelligent Design” is a religious view, not a scientific theory, according to U.S. District Judge John E. Jones III in his historic decision in Kitzmiller v. Dover. x�+� � | endobj endstream 214 0 obj <>stream endstream 162 0 obj <>stream 250 0 obj <>stream 209 0 obj <>stream x��?�0���)nԡ�^i�8�80I����`!����[�\r��.��������f�; ߑ N (bo�g9�H�}� endstream 275 0 obj <>stream endstream Get Free Traipsing Into Evolution Intelligent Design And The Kitzmiller V Dover Decision can be your partner. 61) x�+� � | x�+� � | x�+� � | x�+� � | endstream endstream 2d 707 (M.D. 121 0 obj <>stream endstream 136 0 obj <>stream 36 0 obj <>stream 114 0 obj <>stream 47 0 obj <>stream endobj y� �4�is��z�:j~��ڨ,J,8��w���V�q� k��@6�y�{�$�o��ݩpT�O"� endobj x�+� � | Dover Decision ( KB pdf); Kitzmiller Plaintiff’s Brief ( “Intelligent Design” is a religious view, not a scientific theory, according to U.S. District Judge John E. Jones III in his historic decision in Kitzmiller v. Dover. x�+� � | ��3�����{�ƷDs4g<5}�՘;HZ\���Q驦�"� endobj 37 0 obj <>stream en español In the legal case Kitzmiller v. Dover, tried in in a Harrisburg, PA, Federal District Court, “intelligent design” was found Decision in Kitzmiller v. endobj endstream endobj x��?�0���)nԡ�^i�8�80I����`!����[�\r��.��������f�; ߑ N (bo�g9�H�}� 72 0 obj <>stream endstream endobj x�+� � | x�+� � | x��?�0���)n�y���8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������h37l�=���1D�w$�������7� �e��߄�q.�� endstream This was the first time in America that any schools at any level had specifically promoted Intelligent Design. 41 0 obj <>stream 32 0 obj <>stream endstream x�+� � | endobj x�+� � | 57 0 obj <>stream endstream x����@D��Sjܻ,�b�bA%�6����wer�IN&���w��X�� ��l,�%�Q��(��a�5����M�94/�c�߈UnmT��9.�g���V�8�w߅�Dq��U���W`�!iq���F���~G]"� Traipsing Into Evolution: Intelligent Design and the Kitzmiller vs. Dover Decision (DI Press, 2006). 261 0 obj <>stream endstream 239 0 obj <>stream x����@D��Sjܻ,�����$[X�\F >�ߕ�I&9�jz���S�".va�:q���Xc�GZ�W�޲N�o��8�Te�s���F��"��=\�[�8��"OM l1w�|s���F���~E)"� endobj 95 0 obj <>stream endstream Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District involved a policy under which “students will be made aware of gaps/problems in Darwin's theory and of other theories of evolution including, but not limited to, intelligent design.” Pursuant to the policy, the school district drafted a disclaimer that teachers were required to read in class prior to teaching evolution. endstream 269 0 obj <>stream x��?�0���)n�y���8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������h37l�=��A��;� E�sXc�GZ�W�޲N�o��8�Te��s���F����=\�[�8����>@sɊ˴�7*=���"� 252 0 obj <>stream endobj endstream endobj endobj endobj x�M=�@�߯���{���*L����B� ����=i�4i�5=h��1".j��ux���k!�#A�@P��7R��8��5�%�#9[�S�ķ����eZ���j� �"� endobj endobj endstream K"� 0[6I�MX�%UY���~�0���Z�q��k|�G8_��D4��7�i�oTz��C�"� endstream �#F���S_��0�j߼"�Vj�~�T�9Q��:��g���V8�xMo��ɲX��#��܁s���Fe��~ endobj Dover Decision ( KB pdf); Kitzmiller Plaintiff’s Brief ( “Intelligent Design” is a religious view, not a scientific theory, according to U.S. District Judge John E. Jones III in his historic decision in Kitzmiller v. 53 0 obj <>stream endstream endobj endobj endobj x�+� � | x��?�0���)n�y���8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������h�X��=��Aeߑ N (bo��~�վy�-��&��sIUV��0��1LodZ-�8��5�����,���Jc� Yq���F���~�"� x��?�0���)nԡ�^[�8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������X3�8wx����!�#A�@P�>E���#���+�n٪��XgΩ����an?c��0V/�8��5�%��9]�����ALq���F���~�"� endstream 119 0 obj <>stream endstream x�+� � | 281 0 obj <>stream endstream endstream x�+� � | endstream 52 0 obj <>stream endobj 240 0 obj <>stream endstream endobj 04cv2688 Plaintiffs :: v. : Judge Jones: DOVER AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT and : DOVER AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT : BOARD OF DIRECTORS, : Defendants. endobj endobj endobj endstream x����@D��Sjܻ,�b�bA%�6����wer�IN&���w��X�� ��l,�%��( Une page de Wikipédia, l'encyclopédie libre. x����@D��Sjܻ,�����$[X�\F >�ߕ�I&9�jz���S�".va�:Q� �gS%����7� �e��߄�q.�� endstream 164 0 obj <>stream Author: Administrator: Date and time of digitizing: 05:18, 20 December 2005: Software used: PScript5.dll Version 5.2: File change date and time: 05:18, 20 December 2005 endobj x��?�0���)n�y���8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������h��l�=������H'�7���i�o^z�:i� �ܹ�*+�u����72�p���R��lxj��0w���Lk��SM?�"� endstream x�+� � | endobj 48 0 obj <>stream endobj 165 0 obj <>stream x����@D��Sjܻ,�����$[X�\F >����I&9�����S�".va�:�N��(��qA����?�j�>�u�}Vƹ��j��_���r���0��%�e�#\��,����y��Tyj��:"3 ""� endobj endobj endstream endstream x����@D��Sj�pﲰ����$[X�\F >�ߕ�I&9�jz���1".v^�ux������ �g-���i�o^f�F�_źpNUe�s���Ff�"��=\�[�9��"OM��$�\���Q驦B�"� x��?�0���)n�y���8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������h�X��=��AD�w$����6�i�o^z�:i� +�\R��:��g��V8�p�o��h6<5}�X�$+.��ߨ�T�{"� endstream x�+� � | endobj endobj endstream T"� endobj 42 0 obj <>stream Dover Area School District policy requiring the teaching of intelligent design. x�+� � | endobj v. Dover Area School Board (2005), a controversial district court decision about the teaching of intelligent design in public schools. �"� endstream x��?�0���)nԡ�^)�8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������3��: ߑ N (b���~�վy�-�~��9U��:��g���8�p�o��h�xj� �b� iq���F���~("� x�+� � | endobj Dover Area School District policy requiring the teaching of intelligent design. x�+� � | endobj endobj x�+� � | : Case No. x�+� � | Judge John E. Jones III's decision barring Dover Area School District from mentioning intelligent design in a ninth-grade biology class. x�+� � | 84 0 obj <>stream endstream pdf Dover Complaint 12-14-04 .pdf; pdf Dover - Answer to Defendants' Statement of Material Fact.pdf; pdf Dover Plaintiffs' Proposed Findings and Conclusions.pdf; pdf Dover Decision 12-20-05.pdf; pdf Kitzmiller Plaintiff's Brief 11-23-05 .pdf 145 0 obj <>stream 40 0 obj <>stream endstream endstream 96 0 obj <>stream