• Was there a good match between the research problem and the methods used – that is, was a … A guide to critiquing a research paper. Indeed, the word allowance in many health journals will only allow for detailed discussion of a few implications. Therefore the method of data collection should address the research issue/question. Part 1: Quantitative research (Coughlan et al.) A new framework for critiquing health-related research is presented in this article. A framework for critiquing qualitative research articles This is Table 7.3 found in chapter 7 and provides a framework for critiquing qualitative research articles. It is vital for readers to understand the aims and questions of the research in order to answer sections of the framework. Qualitative research needs to answer questions set by the researcher (there is no hypothesis). Now customize the name of a clipboard to store your clips. CRITIQUE QUALITATIVE While frameworks for critiquing qualitative research exist, they are often complex and more suited to the needs of students engaged in advanced levels of study. Caution should still be exercised as to whether published research is repetitive of previous research or conducted well - hence the reason for a critiquing framework - and adds to the body of nursing knowledge. There are several frameworks for critiquing research, some of which have been constructed to critique or evaluate both qualitative and quantitative studies. It is also available on the internet, with more detailed questions than can be discussed within this article (www.phru.nhs.uk/casp/critical_appraisal_tools.htm). - Is there a clear statement of the aims of the research? When critiquing qualitative research studies it is necessary to appraise the literature review in the context of the particular methodology used, if the literature review is appropriate only after the period of data collection, then the researcher needs to identify how this process is to be achieved and in what way the literature is going to be used to determine similarities with or differences from the research findings. Others, however, have been constructed to critique only one of these. The development of such skills should assist pre-registration students with relevant assignments. Visit our, Understanding and critiquing qualitative research papers, 100 years: Centenary of the nursing register, 2020: International Year of the Nurse and Midwife, Nursing Times Workforce Summit and Awards, 060718Understanding and critiquing qualitative research papers, Don’t miss your latest monthly issue of Nursing Times, Sexual harassment against nurses: Tell us your experiences, Uganda’s pioneer midwife meets HRH The Duchess of Cambridge, How will genomics benefit my patients? These should be examined within the research report with examples (quotes) from each theme being given. What topic is the... 3. RESEARCH PRESENTATION: Critique Studio II, BP KOIRALA INSTITUTE OF HELATH SCIENCS,, NEPAL, No public clipboards found for this slide, Framework of A Critique Qualitative Research Article. - Was there a clear statement of findings? 85-102), and there are a number of ways in which qualitative research principles are applied to research projects. stitutes qualitative research is made more complex by the number of para-digms that can serve as foundations for qualitative research. Once the data has been analysed thoroughly, the findings should be clearly displayed. It is … A researcher undertaking a study on this topic may: follow a particular ethnic group over a prolonged period of time - in the past this would have involved living among that population (this is known as ethnography); explore what patients understand about the different treatments and build a theory as the research progresses (grounded theory); or explore the lived experience of hypertension (phenomenology). Part 1: quantitative research Br J Nurs. As practitioners gain a deeper understanding of critiquing a single piece of research, they should consider critiquing several research studies on a particular topic, searching for common themes. More commonly used existing frameworks tend to have been formulated within the quantitative research paradigm. Quantitative and Qualitative research techniques are the two main approaches to research studies. Critiquing Qualitative Research Search this Guide Search. IMRAD Evaluating information is an important part of the research process. - Was the recruitment strategy appropriate to the aims of the research? This series outlines the two main approaches to research (recognising that there are other more specialised approaches) and explains how to read and critique qualitative and quantitative research (see last week’s issue for part two in the series). Critiquing Qualitative Research Critiquing Quantitative Research Writing a Paper ... Conceptual/theoretical framework: Are key concepts adequately defined conceptually? Criteria differ for critiquing a quantitative versus a qualitative study (ie, statistics are evaluated in a quantitative study, but not in a qualitative study). Box 1 shows some of the commonly utilised frameworks within the nursing literature. CASP has appraisal checklists designed for use with Systematic Reviews, Randomised Controlled Trials, Cohort Studies, Case Control Studies, Economic Evaluations, Diagnostic Studies, Qualitative studies and Clinical Prediction Rule. Framework of A Critique Qualitative Research Article 1. Readers should therefore be careful before boldly stating that a researcher did not consider a certain aspect, since it may have been discussed at length in the original (unpublished) research report. Although there are many ways to analyse qualitative data, researchers normally organise it into common groups/topics (themes). Don’t think that just because it isn’t included in the list of submittals, you don’t have to design a conceptual framework for your dissertation. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) framework has been chosen as it has separate frameworks for qualitative and quantitative research. Polly Lee, MSc, BA, RSCN, RGN, RM, DipN, ILTM, is lecturer in child health nursing, City University, London. Researchers must be careful not to introduce bias by accidentally reporting their interpretation of participants’ feelings. HTML) presents a framework for critically appraising qualitative research built around ten questions, with supporting detailed guidelines. Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. They should also help practitioners to determine if a piece of research is relevant and suitable to be implemented in their practice. Download electronic versions of tables 7.2 and 7.3 in the text to print off and help you when critiquing quantitative and qualitative research articles. While frameworks for critiquing qualitative research exist, they are often complex and more suited to the needs of students engaged in advanced levels of study. “Qualitative researchers are interested in understanding how people interpret their experiences, how they construct their worlds, and what meaning they attribute to their experiences” (Merriam, 2009, p. 5). Areas that are specific to qualitative research include the relationship between the researcher and the participants and rigor in relation to data analysis. The author was able to make reasonable and founded interpretations from her findings. RESEARCH ARTICLE. The questions in frameworks for critiquing qualitative research tend to be sequential. It is vital for readers to understand the aims and questions of the research in order to answer sections of the framework. • Did the problem statement build a persuasive argument for the new study? Nursing journals have different expectations regarding how much discussion should be included regarding the trustworthiness of qualitative research. These may be more easily understood by returning to the example used in the first article of the series. This makes it important for readers to examine author guidelines for the particular journal. http://www.qualitativeresearchcritique.com Check this presentation if you don't know how to write your critique qualitative research. FOCUS In every critical review of qualitative research, there should be a center of the study. Within qualitative research the most common methods of data collection are interview, questionnaire or observation. After reading the article you should be able to: Use the following points to write a reflection for your PREP portfolio: Sign in or Register a new account to join the discussion. The first article in this series on understanding research (Lee, 2006a) examined the basic terminology used by researchers and identified that qualitative research produced non-numerical (qualitative) data. Critical evaluation of an identified qualitative research study All healthcare professionals are required to understand and promote evidence based practice, and therefore are required to identify and evaluate primary research which is relevant to their own areas of practice and professional activity (Rycroft-Malone et al, 2004 p. 81-82). A research study needs to follow the steps in the process in a logical manner.There should also be a clear link between the steps beginning with the purpose of the study and following through the literature review, the theoretical framework, the research question, the methodology section, the data analysis, and the findings (Ryan-Wenger, 1992). If a conceptual framework or ideological orientation guided the study, are the themes or patterns linked to it in a cogent manner? To enable the critique of this article the Caldwell critiquing tool (2005) will be utilized. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. Finally, readers should consider implications of the research for nursing and midwifery. Research Critique Framework: Quantitative Research • Is the problem significant for nursing? It would not be possible to use the quantitative paradigm and collect numerical data for this. Qualitative researchers justify this approach by suggesting that it is not possible to separate the context or setting in which the phenomenon occurs from the phenomenon itself (Morse and Field, 1996). Readers of qualitative research need a sound understanding of the terminology specific to this type of research to make full sense of the report. Critiquing frameworks enable readers to make … These different methods are used to obtain slightly different data. This discussed a patient being asked about their experiences of receiving different treatment for hypertension. Overall, the research reflects consistency between procedure, data and interpretation. Framework for How to Read and Critique a Research Study [pdf] One page list, in pdf form, of things to look for in a research article. The conceptual phase The conceptual phase of a study sets the scene. The researcher focus on how nursing home quality can be understand from Table 7.2: Quantitative research articles. Within some qualitative approaches (phenomenology) researchers must separate out (bracket) and declare their feelings at the beginning of the research project. By NT Contributor. The intended aim(s) of the research should therefore be stated and the questions the research seeks to address should be identified. Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later. Careful examination of qualitative research gives practitioners a better understanding of how a group of people view or understand a particular situation. - Was the research design appropriate to address the aims of the research? But for many qualified and student nurses, the terminology used in research can be difficult to understand, thus making critical read … Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Critiquing frameworks enable readers to make a judgement regarding the soundness of the research. For example, it is not possible to obtain patients’ thoughts and feelings of their different treatments for hypertension by observing them. References: Bersntein, K.S (2000). Understand the nature and purpose of qualitative research; Understand what these frameworks aim to achieve; Be familiar with how qualitative research can help practitioners. The results of this critiquing process, including the identifications of strengths and limitations of the article, form the remainder of this paper. The 10 main questions that the CASP asks of qualitative research are listed in Box 2. See our User Agreement and Privacy Policy. All You Need To Know About Conceptual Framework in Qualitative Research A conceptual framework may not be necessary for your thesis or dissertation but it is certainly important. Part 2: Qualitative research (Coughlan et al.) Many of the issues affecting quantitative research reported in the second article in this series (Lee, 2006b) also apply to qualitative research, such as restrictions on word limits. Areas that are specific to qualitative research include the relationship between the researcher and the participants and rigour in relation to data analysis. Developing critiquing skills is part of the answer. Data analysis is both time consuming and rigorous within qualitative research. Methodological appraisal of a paper on nurses in abortion care (Lipp & Fothergill) Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. The research approach normally influences its design. The notion of qualitative (non-numerical) and quantitative (numerical) data was also introduced. Critiquing A Research Article Qualitative Nursing Essay. The Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (www.corec.org.uk) offers guidance for researchers planning to undertake any research within the NHS. Looks like you’ve clipped this slide to already. The skill of critiquing is illustrated with the aid of two critiquing frameworks; one for qualitative research articles and the other for qualitative research. This is not just about obtaining ‘ethical approval’ for a study but also ensuring the rights of participants are not violated. It is clearly not possible to cover every aspect of a study in a journal report. In order to critique the selected article, the Caldwell et al., (2005) critiquing framework was employed, to ensure a valid and objective approach to the appraisal process. The questions in frameworks for critiquing qualitative research tend to be sequential. The ability to critique research is a valuable skill that is fundamental to a perioperative nurse's ability to base his or her clinical practice on evidence derived from research. Slideshare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. The majority of research is never published even though it may have the potential to make a valuable contribution to the development of nursing knowledge. These are the most common approaches used in qualitative research. Frameworks for critiquing research articles. THE PROCESS OF RESEARCH CRITIQUE The major steps in the research process described by Polit and Hungler (1995) are used here to demonstrate the process of critiquing qualitative research, and the questions the reader needs to be aware of are summarized in Table 1. This type of research aims to report a situation as it actually is in a natural rather than a laboratory setting. When reporting qualitative research, participants’ anonymity and confidentiality must not be breached. ... Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. You can change your ad preferences anytime. ‘Nursing Now’s work will help nurses of the future’, 18 July, 2006 By reading the author guidelines of professional journals readers are better able to determine what authors can include (and therefore by implication exclude), and then relate this to the critiquing framework outlined above. Qualitative research is an umbrella term used to describe a variety of qualitative research designs. FRAMEWORK OF A The skills outlined in this series are also essential prerequisites for those intending to undertake a critical review of literature, begin their own programme of research, or undertake systematic reviews of research. BACKGROUND How the … This set of eight critical appraisal tools are designed to be used when reading research. They could then write a critical review of the literature on that chosen topic. The framework presented in this article addresses both quantitative and qualitative research within one list of questions. This paper presents a critique of a qualitative research article titled: ‘Perceived support from healthcare practitioners among adults with type 2 diabetes’ (Oftedal et al, 2010) (appendix 1). The researcher adequately applied the principles of qualitative research to come out with a valid and reliable study. We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. It is more important therefore for qualitative researchers to ensure that participants have experienced the phenomenon rather than randomly selecting people who may not be able to answer the questions. 1. FRAMEWORK OF A CRITIQUE QUALITATIVE RESEARCH ARTICLE 2. Qualitative research emerged in the past century as a useful framework for social science research, but its history has not been the story of steady, sustained progress along one path. The framework presented in this article addresses both quantitative and qualitative research within one list of questions. News about identification of genetic variants may be a hot topic but…, Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our, EMAP Publishing Limited Company number 7880758 (England & Wales) Registered address: 7th Floor, Vantage London, Great West Road, Brentford, United Kingdom, TW8 9AG, We use cookies to personalize and improve your experience on our site. While these implications can relate to the practice, education, research and management of nursing and midwifery, not all research reports detail the implications for all aspects of the professions. Within qualitative research the researcher and participant often have a ‘close relationship’, especially if the researcher returns to the participant on several occasions over a period of time - which may even run into many months. Nursing is a science, and as such, it needs to have a firm base in creditable research … critiquing qualitative research exist, they are often complex and more suited to the needs of students engaged in advanced levels of study. STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The problem statement is unequivocally and easily located in the first paragraph of the article. Outline where you work and the relevance of this article to your practice; Identify the last time you came across a piece of qualitative research; Discuss something new you have learnt about qualitative research in this article; Explain how this information could have informed your care of a patient; Outline how you intend to disseminate what you have learnt among your colleagues. While it is possible to critique a piece of research without them, frameworks serve as useful aides-memoires for those who are not used to critiquing research. That is, the research design tells readers how the researcher actually implemented the research approach. - Was the data analysis sufficiently rigorous? This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. See our Privacy Policy and User Agreement for details. This chapter clarifies the meaning and purpose of critiquing. Ethical issues are important and should be considered at every step of the research process. Within qualitative research there are different approaches (methodologies). ...Unit 6: Critiquing Qualitative and Quantitative Research Kaplan University July 16, 2013 Unit 6 Critiquing Qualitative and Quantitative Research The research conducted by Foster-Fitzpatrick, Ortiz, Sibilano, Marcantonio and Braun (1999) is a quantitative study of the significance of crossing the legs while blood pressure is being measured. This article focuses on one framework designed for critiquing research. It can therefore enable individual practitioners to enhance their practice and contribute to evidence-based practice. Center for Nursing Excellence: Critiquing Qualitative Research. - Is a qualitative methodology appropriate? Part 2: qualitative research. Each week Nursing Times publishes a guided learning article with reflection points to help you with your CPD. Some of the terminology that relates to qualitative and quantitative research and how these relate to different worldviews (paradigms) was introduced in the first article in this series. The article does not mention any usage of a theoretical framework for the research. Slideshare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. Recruitment to any research project is an important consideration but qualitative researchers often want to obtain the thoughts or opinions of a specific group of people who have experienced a phenomenon. 2007 Jun 14-27;16(11):658-63. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2007.16.11.23681. The terminology used in some professional journals would require inexperienced readers to explore meanings further. Although it is easy for qualitative researchers to make assumptions and want to interpret the data quickly, they really need to be ‘immersed’ in the data over a period of time as the first stage of data analysis. Greenhalgh & Taylor (1997) provide an overview of the nature of qualitative research and again suggest a framework for critique based on nine questions with supporting guidance. - Was data collected in a way that addressed the research issue? What nurses and health professionals need to know, All Our Health boosts support for mental health and wellbeing, A university with a focus on student satisfaction, Recognising and addressing the hidden cardiovascular risks in people with type 2 diabetes, Interactive e-learning support for nurses now available, Free Webinar Series: Essential Skills – Continence Care Week, Tributes to primary care nurse leader who ‘just loved nursing’, Wales appoints UK’s first CNO from ethnic minority background, ‘My nursing degree has taught me so much about myself’, Nursing union backs ‘urgent action’ to meet NHS carbon emissions target, Developing local guidelines on deprescribing in end-of-life care, RCN launches first-ever workforce standards for staff and patient safety, Registered General Nurse (Residential Care Home), Registered Nurse, Excellent Pay and Benefits, Swansea Bay (Wales), This content is for health professionals only. In fact not all qualitative researchers report these ideas in the same way - some use the notion of trustworthiness, whereas others use the terms validity and reliability, which are actually related more to quantitative research. This framework was chosen because it provides specific guidelines for critiquing qualitative research, encompasses all the elements influencing believability and robustness of the research … A Mixed Approach is another method that integrates both the qualitative and quantitative approaches. This has many of the same aspects of quantitative framework found in 7.2, but has some differences that relate to the principles of qualitative, or ‘interpretative’, research. Quantitative and Qualitative Research Article Critique The ability to properly critique a research article is considered “one of the fundamental skills of scholarship in any discipline” (Nieswiadomy, 2008, p. 378),; this is also true for nursing. - Have ethical issues been taken into consideration? Once data analysis has been completed, then qualitative researchers discuss their findings, although generalisability is not normally possible with qualitative research. Unit 6: Critiquing Qualitative and Quantitative Research Kaplan University July 16, 2013 Unit 6 Critiquing Qualitative and Quantitative Research The research conducted by Foster-Fitzpatrick, Ortiz, Sibilano, Marcantonio and Braun (1999) is a quantitative study of the significance of crossing the legs while blood pressure is being measured. The field of qualitative research methodology is vast, complex and full of a wide range of methodological frameworks and theoretical models (Silverman, 2001 pp. Some research questions are best addressed by qualitative enquiry and others by quantitative enquiry. Is there a conceptual/theoretical framework, rationale, and/or map, and (if so) is it appropriate? Returning to the example of hypertension, a researcher who chooses to ask patients about their experiences of receiving different treatments for hypertension is clearly seeking to use a qualitative paradigm, as the patients’ thoughts and feelings are being considered, so qualitative (non-numerical) data will be collected. For example, the term ‘constant comparative analysis’ would be familiar to qualitative researchers - particularly those who use the grounded theory approach (methodology) even though there may not be space within the journal to explain why this is unique to one particular research approach.